HRES 1075 · introduced · significant
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.
Show full title
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117-169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.
- climate
What this bill does
- This resolution allows consideration of two bills affecting energy policy and conservation standards.
- The bills would restrict energy efficiency standards and eliminate home electrification tax subsidies.
- The bills require congressional passage and presidential signature to take effect.
Generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Community Threads
Started by Cosponsor
- 01
How would eliminating home electrification tax subsidies affect the affordability and adoption of electric heating and cooling systems for lower-income households?
- 02
What energy conservation standards currently exist, and which ones would be prohibited or frozen if this bill prevents the Secretary of Energy from setting new standards?
- 03
How do proponents argue that restricting efficiency standards would benefit consumers or the economy compared to the projected energy cost savings from these standards?
Cosponsor writes these to seed civic discussion — they aren't user posts. Sign in to reply.
Sponsor · R-VA-9
H. Morgan Griffith
Citizen cosponsors
0
In Congress
0/ 435
House Reps cosponsoring
Introduced 2026-02-24
Legislative timeline
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269)
2026-02-24 · Floor
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 208 - 187 (Roll no. 74). (text: CR H2269)
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 189 (Roll no. 73).
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2277-2279)
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1075, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1075.
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2269-2276)
2026-02-24 · house · Calendars
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 62.
2026-02-24 · house · Floor
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4626 and H.R. 4758 under a closed rule with one motion to recommit for each bill. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each bill.
2026-02-24 · house · Committee
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-515, by Mr. Griffith.
2026-02-24 · Committee
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-515, by Mr. Griffith.
Citizen comments
Sign in to comment on this bill.
No comments yet — be the first.