HR 665 · introduced · significant
Noncontiguous Shipping Competition Act
- economy
What this bill does
- This bill relaxes rules requiring domestic ships to be U.S.-built and U.S.-crewed for routes to Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and other U.S. territories.
- Shipping companies and consumers in noncontiguous U.S. regions are affected, as well as domestic shipbuilders and maritime workers.
- The exemption applies only if fewer than three independent U.S. operators serve a route, potentially lowering shipping costs to remote areas.
Generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Community Threads
Started by Cosponsor
- 01
How might allowing foreign ships on underserved routes affect jobs and wages for U.S. maritime workers in Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico?
- 02
What evidence supports the claim that relaxing domestic shipping requirements will meaningfully reduce consumer costs in noncontiguous regions?
- 03
If this exemption passes, what safeguards could prevent foreign operators from displacing domestic shipbuilders and crews once they establish market presence?
Cosponsor writes these to seed civic discussion — they aren't user posts. Sign in to reply.

Sponsor · D-HI-1
Ed Case
Citizen cosponsors
0
In Congress
2/ 435
House Reps cosponsoring
Introduced 2025-02-04
Joining the bill
Legislative timeline
2025-02-04 · IntroReferral
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E90-91)
2025-01-24 · house · Committee
Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
2025-01-23 · house · IntroReferral
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
2025-01-23 · IntroReferral
Introduced in House
2025-01-23 · IntroReferral
Introduced in House
Citizen comments
Sign in to comment on this bill.
No comments yet — be the first.