Cosponsor
Sign in

HR 6048 · in committee · significant

NDO Fairness Act

What this bill does

  • This bill makes it harder for the government to obtain secret orders that delay notifying people when their electronic communications are requested.
  • It affects people whose emails and digital records may be sought by law enforcement during investigations.
  • Courts must now write detailed justifications for these orders, which expire in 90 days unless extended, and the Justice Department must report annually on their use.

Generated by claude-haiku-4-5

Community Threads

Started by Cosponsor

  1. 01

    How would requiring detailed court justifications and 90-day expiration dates for delayed notification orders affect law enforcement's ability to conduct investigations?

  2. 02

    What balance should exist between protecting citizens' right to know when their digital communications are requested and allowing investigators time to pursue cases?

  3. 03

    How might annual Justice Department reporting on delayed notification orders change how courts and the public understand their frequency and necessity?

Cosponsor writes these to seed civic discussion — they aren't user posts. Sign in to reply.

Sponsor · R-WI-5

Scott Fitzgerald

Citizen cosponsors

0

In Congress

1/ 435

House Reps cosponsoring

Introduced 2025-11-20

Joining the bill

Legislative timeline

  1. 2025-11-20 · house · Committee

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

  2. 2025-11-20 · house · Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  3. 2025-11-18 · house · Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  4. 2025-11-17 · house · IntroReferral

    Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  5. 2025-11-17 · IntroReferral

    Introduced in House

  6. 2025-11-17 · IntroReferral

    Introduced in House

Congress.gov ↗

Citizen comments

Sign in to comment on this bill.

No comments yet — be the first.