To provide a private right of action against the maker of any component of a ghost gun, and any person who facilitated a sale of the ghost gun, for injury or death resulting from the use of the ghost gun.

1. 01

   How would manufacturers distinguish between selling components for legal assembly versus ghost gun production, and what compliance costs would they face?

2. 02

   What evidence supports that civil liability suits would reduce ghost gun injuries compared to other regulatory approaches?

3. 03

   Who would bear the financial burden of litigation and settlements—manufacturers, insurance companies, or ultimately consumers through higher prices?

Cosponsor writes these to seed civic discussion — they aren't user posts. Sign in to reply.