Safe Vehicle Access for Survivors Act

1. 01

   How would car manufacturers balance quickly disabling abuser access within two business days against verifying that requests come from actual survivors rather than unauthorized users?

2. 02

   What evidence exists that connected vehicle features are commonly used by abusers to locate or control survivors, and does this justify the compliance costs manufacturers would bear?

3. 03

   If a survivor's request is later disputed or found fraudulent, who bears responsibility for restoring access and what legal protections would apply to the car company?

Cosponsor writes these to seed civic discussion — they aren't user posts. Sign in to reply.